Contact, if you are interested in this website / domain name / sponsorship / advertisement / partnership

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

A side-by-side look at Claude Sonnet 5.5 from Anthropic and GPT-6.1 Sol from OpenAI: list prices, context windows, licensing and capabilities, with monthly costs worked out for three common workloads.

Data checked October 10, 2026Open in the compare tool

The short version

  • Price: effectively tied on blended list price.
  • Larger context window: GPT-6.1 Sol (1.05M vs 1M tokens).
  • Inputs: Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts text, images, pdf; GPT-6.1 Sol accepts text, images.
  • Newer release: GPT-6.1 Sol (September 29, 2026).

Specs side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Sep 29, 2026
StatusCurrentCurrent
Weights and licenseClosed ProprietaryClosed Proprietary
TierAdvancedAdvanced
Context window1M1.05M
Max output125K125K
Input per 1M tokens$2$2
Output per 1M tokens$10$10
Cached input per 1M$0.10$0.10
Input typesText, Images, PDFText, Images
Reasoning modeYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
ParametersUndisclosedUndisclosed

Highlighted cells are better on that line: lower price or larger limit. List prices, standard tier, checked October 10, 2026.

What they cost for real workloads

Workload (monthly)Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 SolDifference
Support chatbot30,000 conversations a month, 2,000 input and 400 output tokens each$240$240
Document summaries2,000 documents a month, 12,000 input and 800 output tokens each$64$64
Coding agent1,000 tasks a month, 60,000 input and 6,000 output tokens each$180$180

Standard rates without caching or batch discounts. Try your own volumes.

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 if

  • you mainly need it for chat, writing, which Anthropic emphasizes for this model
  • your inputs include pdf
  • half the per-token price of Claude Opus 5.5
  • 1M-token context window and 128K-token output limit

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol if

  • you mainly need it for reasoning, enterprise, which OpenAI emphasizes for this model
  • you need more than 1M tokens of context in one request
  • $2 input and $10 output per million tokens, with cached input at $0.10
  • 1.05M-token context window

Our take

Both are positioned for agents, coding. On list price the gap is about 1.0×, which matters most for high-volume, input-heavy workloads. Quality differences shift with every release, so treat this page as a shortlist tool: run 20-50 of your real tasks through both, score the outputs, and divide the bill by the number of tasks each one got right.

Read the full profiles: Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol. For help designing that test, see how to read LLM benchmarks.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol has the lower list price: $2 input and $10 output per million tokens, versus $2 and $10. Discounts for caching and batch processing can change the real bill, so price your own token mix.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol accepts 1.05M tokens, compared with 1M for Claude Sonnet 5.5.

Can I run Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol on my own hardware?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is closed, so only through hosted APIs. GPT-6.1 Sol is closed, so only through hosted APIs.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

It depends on the task. Public benchmarks and arena rankings move with every release and rarely match a specific workload. Use the specs here to shortlist, then test both on your own prompts and compare accuracy, latency and cost per correct answer.

Still choosing a model?

Send us your use case and constraints. We'll come back with a shortlist and an evaluation plan you can run on your own data.

  • Free and vendor-neutral: no model provider pays for placement.
  • Your details go only to partners you agree to.

Takes about 2 minutes. No sales calls unless you ask for one.